Oops! Accidental Comment Rejection

While I do believe I'm right much more than I'm wrong about PUSD issues, that doesn't make me immune from mistakes.

A few minutes ago, I accidentally rejected two comments I meant to publish when I was distracted by an interruption and clicked the wrong button. As clearly stated before, I fully intend to publish ALL comments that are even reasonably respectful, whether or not the commentator agrees with me. For what it's worth, I interpreted one comment as "supportive" and one as "questioning" my take on things.

So if you read this, "Hello" and "IM4PUSD" (I think I remember the names correctly), please resubmit your comments and I will be glad to publish them right away. And thanks for taking the time to comment.

Comments & Facts on This Blog

My apologies for not approving comments sooner the past few days. Several comments, some supportive of me and some not, have waited equally. I was simply unable to check the blog for the past several days.

Several folks, both here and on other blogs, have accused me of not having my facts straight because they read my post as stating that the Duo have endorsed the recall. That is not correct, although I can understand how some people might have understood it that way.

I started the post by referring to "Several anonymous bloggers," which includes those who comment on the Duos' blogs, Newszap and AzCentral. There was a separate paragraph about the "Duo" that doesn't even reference the possible recall. The paragraph that references the possible recall refers to the "several" bloggers, as does my mission statement at the top of the blog.

So my "facts" are not wrong, after all. Some folks simply misinterpreted what I said. To avoid pointless discussion about tangental issues, I will grant that a reasonable person might have read it that way in good faith. I will be happy to clarify my intent for the future by re-wording the statement in the page header.